Taking September Off

For the past five years, I have dedicated my blog platform in the month of September to raise awareness and dollars for pediatric cancer research. I’ve done this by telling the story of my daughter’s cancer and inviting other families living with childhood cancer to do the same.  I have been honored to share ninety stories in the September Series, as well as writing and sharing Donna’s Cancer Story.

This year, with some regret and some relief, I am choosing to take September off.

It’s hard to explain the toll it has taken, how hard these Septembers have been for me and on me, and by extension, on my family.  That personal cost has always felt somehow less important than the pain and suffering of children with cancer and those who love them.  I have done the work of steeling myself and pushing forward, believing that the benefits of these stories far outweigh whatever intangible price I have paid personally.

My gut is telling me to pull back this year.  I am trying to accept that knowing my limitations is a sign of strength and not weakness.  I am working to convince myself that I am not walking away from a cause that is near and dear to me — helping people see and understand the cost of underfunded research for childhood cancer, but that I am choosing to care for myself so that I can continue my advocacy, in whatever form that turns out to be.

It’s been a hard sell.

Last week I wrote a blog post about the three grieving parents that told the stories of their children at the Republican and Democratic political conventions.  Despite me stating very clearly that I did not judge Patricia Smith or Mr. and Mrs. Khan, despite me saying in black and white that given the chance and an invitation, I would surely make the same choice as the three grieving parents, despite me having told the story of my own grief for the past five years, more than a few readers chose to misinterpret the post and suggest, in lauguage both kind and unkind, that I was being hypocritical.

The comments on my Mary Tyler Mom Facebook page and the online comments after the Chicago Tribune picked up the post to run on their op/ed page drew me closer to deciding to shut it down, my public grief and advocacy, at least for now.  But what led me to embrace my decision, the one I had been dragging my feet on for weeks, was an article I read over the weekend in the New York Times about the Khans’ experience, “Moment in Convention Glare Shakes Up Khans’ American Life.”

The article is moving and powerful, an exploration of how a couple continue on after the loss of a child.  It identifies the anchors the Khans found and those they made and clung to in order to stay afloat and not be lost in their sea of grief.  The story talks about their day-to-day lives and their decision to speak at the Democratic National Convention, to call out Donald Trump for his behavior that the Khans fear, justifiably.  And then it touches on the price they have paid as a result of their public grieving, their public advocacy.

There have been hateful messages, health concerns, suggestions that the Khans and their hero son have acted against the United States of America, their chosen home.  Part of themselves and part of their grief has been lost to them, just as I had imagined it would be when the DNC brass asked them to speak for political purposes.  They are symbols now, for better or for worse.

I respect this couple more than I could ever convey in words.  And, I am taking a lesson from them.  I am following their lead and stepping away from the public aspect of grief and advocacy, at least for now, this September.

I could try and articulate for a reader who has not experienced the loss of a child what the cost has been for me to remain a public symbol or gateway into the world of childhood cancer, but I would fail, I am certain.  There are so many intangibles, so many subjective measures, but they are specific to me and my experiences.  Yes, there have been hateful messages through the years.  Strangers encouraging me to “find a new angle,” or other such nonsense.  But those have by far been overshadowed by the positive reception and welcome appreciation of people across the globe, grateful for having their eyes opened to childhood cancer and its underfunding in research dollars.

My gratitude abounds.

gratitude

But still, part of me wants and needs for my girl, my Donna, to stop being a symbol, stop being a gateway into the childhood cancer community.  When I first shared Donna’s story in 2011, it was with the implicit goal of getting readers to come to know and love her, believing that if someone knew a child with cancer, they would start to care.  And, I think, it worked. Amazingly, astoundingly well.

But still, there is a price to pay for me putting out my girl as bait, hoping she would catch and capture people’s attention, in order for an important goal to be achieved — that strangers to the childhood cancer community would see us and know we exist and that childhood cancer is woefully underfunded by both government and private research grants. I have used my girl and her story, her pain and her suffering, for what I believed to be the greater good. That is my truth, as hard as it is to type, as hard as it is to read, as hard as it is to understand.

With Facebook algorithms changing as they are, fewer of you are reading my words, fewer of you are sharing, and fewer would see any child that would be featured in a 2016 September Series post.  It is hard for me to justify the solicitation of stories, to ask other parents to lay themselves bare, knowing the tangible benefits no longer exist in ways they did even a year ago.  It is more difficult to reach online readers today than it was when I started this method of advocacy in 2011.

I remain so grateful to the dozens and dozens and dozens of families who opened themselves up to share their pain and joy and fear and vulnerability and their children with cancer so that others may gain a better understanding of how devastating a pediatric cancer diagnosis is.  I can never repay to them what they have provided — sharing themselves and their children for you to gain awareness.  I still believe all of our efforts were worthwhile.  And the children I have met remain with me in ways I find hard to explain.  I hold each of them close to me.

Thank you for reading and sticking with us in the childhood cancer community these past five years.  And please remember that even if you are not being fueled with stories of different children every day next month, that children are still being diagnosed, treated, living and dying with cancer. We are all still here, needing you more than ever.

Grieving Parents and Politics: Exploitation all Around

American politics have hit a new low.  Relying on grieving parents who bare their hearts, their sorrows, their souls in front of cheering delegates swathed in red, white, and blue, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are both guilty of exploiting the grief of parents of American heroes to raise their poll numbers.  As a grieving parent myself, I watch, disgusted and enraged and torn.

During the Republican National Convention, Patricia Smith addressed the delegates, angry and sad, telling the world she holds Hillary Clinton personally responsible for the death of her son, Sean Smith, who perished in the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Bengazhi.  She called for Hillary to be put in prison and “wear stripes” for her crimes against America.

Last week we saw the parents of Captain Humayun Khan, a Muslim American soldier who perished in Iraq while protecting his fellow soldiers, address the delegates at the Democratic National Convention.  Captain Khan’s father, Khizr Khan, gave an impassioned speech, indignant and angry, accompanied by his wife, telling the world that Donald Trump has never sacrificed for his country and offered him a pocket copy of our Constitution for his edification.

Left, Patricia Smith, mother of Sean Smith.  Upper right, Ghazala Khan, mother of Captain Humayun Khan.  Lower right, Khizr Khan, father of Captain Kahn.
Left, Patricia Smith, mother of Sean Smith. Upper right, Ghazala Khan, mother of Captain Humayun Khan. Lower right, Khizr Khan, father of Captain Kahn.

Is one parent’s grief more potent than the others?  Can a parent’s grief be devalued, depending on if you identify as Republican or Democrat? How can we knowingly and willingly leverage the grief associated with Americans killed while serving their country abroad?  Will these speeches result in votes?

I am torn because as someone who grieves a child, I know full well the lengths I will go to to tell my child’s story, to ensure she is not forgotten, to share her name and her image in the hopes that her life meant something. I have willingly and proudly addressed all manner of audiences, from 5 to 500, when given the opportunity to discuss my daughter and the woeful underfunding of pediatric cancer research in America.  Hell, had Hillary or Donald called me up to tell my girl’s story at their convention, well, I am certain I would have said yes, if they promised to champion my cause.

The grief of these three parents is something I recognize and understand. Their anger, their invisible wounds, their need to say their child’s name out loud, tell their story, see the tears in stranger’s eyes as they learn, for the first time, of the child they raised and cared for who left them too soon.  I get it.  I get all of it.  I understand their motivations and I cast no judgment.

But even so, I shrink at the sight of the delegates, Republican and Democrats, filled with the fever of their chosen candidate, cheering at the words of these parents. The anger associated with grief, because, well, there is always anger, is welcomed, cheered on, clapped for, validated.  The cameras cut away to the delegates, moved, of course, tears running down their cheeks.  GO, DONALD!  GO, HILLARY!

Then, of course, there is the parade of endless talking heads going on about how mobilized the crowd was by Patricia Smith’s calls for Hillary to be locked up.  How effective it was for a grieving mother to personally cast blame on the Democratic nominee for the death of her son.  This is political gold, people!  Then we have Mr. Khan and his silent wife.  Trump, of course, unable to stop himself, digs a deepening hole by suggesting Captain Khan’s grieving mother is silenced against her wishes because of her Muslim faith.  Cue the outrage!  Cue the interviews!  Hillary has scored some major political currency with this couple!

The delegates are pawns, of course, just as these grieving parents are, just as the talking heads are, just as the American voter is.  We are all chips in an impressive game of votes and power called the American Political System.

Sean Smith and Captain Humayun Khan.  I honor their service and their sacrifice.
Sean Smith and Captain Humayun Khan. I honor their service and their sacrifice.

As a grieving parent, what I keep coming back to are the men lost in service to America.  Sean Smith and Captain Humayun Khan lived and died in service to all of us. They left behind families and futures unfulfilled.  I cannot help but wonder what they might think has come of their sacrifice — the cheering crowds, the talking heads, the divided nation.

May they rest in the peace that eludes America today.

 

The Historical Nature of Tonight’s Taco Dinner

I am a 46 year old woman and tonight while I was cooking dinner for my family, I turned the kitchen radio up louder than my toddler’s rambling so I could hear the roll call of a woman being nominated for President of the United States of America for the very first time.  More than once, I put down my spatula to walk over to the counter near the radio so I could lean in and listen closer.  My eyes welled and it wasn’t the onion I was dicing.

I am surprised by my reaction, honestly.  My tears and pride and just overall sense of being a witness to history are unexpected.  This candidate, the one with breasts and a uterus, was not my first choice.  I feel resigned to her representing me more than elated she is representing me, but still, something about her nomination gives me pause and a sense of purpose that I have not felt before in this election cycle.

These words tonight are not about encouraging you to vote for my candidate of choice, though, you know, sure, that would be cool.  More so, these words tonight are about my need to recognize the little girl I once was who always imagined this day was possible and what it would look like when it came.

As a young girl, I used to plead with my parents to allow me to stay up late to watch the news.  I have always, even as a young girl, been intrigued by politics and political players.  Local and national, politics was something that was talked about loudly and often in our home.  We watched political conventions in our home as a family, we talked about things like the death penalty, gun control, reproductive rights, the ERA.  I always had opinions, I always learned something when I watched and listened.  My insights, even in young childhood, were always welcome.

As a ten year old girl, I saw Chicago elect its first woman mayor. Jane Byrne was brash and tough as steel.  I admired her.  As a fourteen year old girl, I saw Geraldine Ferraro, the first woman Vice Presidential candidate, lose in a landslide that was attributed to Walter Mondale attaching a woman to his ticket.  I knew she was smarter and stronger than he ever would be.  As a twenty-three year old young woman, I got to be one of the voters who elected Carol Moseley Braun as the first female African American U.S. Sentator.  Progress was upon us!

These moments are not insignificant to me.  They have shaped me.

Jane Bryne, Geraldine Ferraro, Carol Moseley Braun, Hillary Clinton
Jane Bryne, Geraldine Ferraro, Carol Moseley Braun, Hillary Clinton

And now, tonight, as I cooked dinner, I came to the realization that as a 46-year-old, I am doing exactly what my Mom did as a 46 year-old wife and mother in 1980– cook dinner for her family.  What I was certain would transpire in my life has not.  I have not broken any glass ceilings.  I have never lived in a high rise.  I have never been a high powered career woman who excels in her field.  Mission not accomplished.

My ten year old self and my fourteen year old self and my twenty-three year old self, I worry, might be disappointed in what I have become. I mean, I was going places, people.  I was going to do and accomplish great and important things.  Because, well, I was smart and strong and being a woman in no way relegated me to being a wife and mother cooking dinner every night for a bunch of ungrateful kids.

Exhale long sigh here.

So, forgive me, if I take a few minutes to breathe in and feel the impact of what has transpired today in Philadelphia — the nomination of a woman to the highest office America can offer.  Commander-in-Chief. FLOTUS to POTUS.  And despite having spared my own head the impact of any glass ceilings, having never needed to ride on an elevator to my front door, having never conquered any corporate jungle, I am here, cooking dinner for my family, tearing up over one mission having been accomplished.  Today.  Tonight.  Right now.

Ninety-six years ago women got the right to vote.  It’s been a long road of cooking those dinners and breaking those ceilings to get here today.  So many women have contributed to that in some way, shape, or form.  I am one of them, if only in small ways.  You, no doubt, are, too.

My life is a good one.  It is not the one I imagined — I mean who in the hell imagines changing diapers at 46 years old?  But it is a good life.  It is full of love and challenges and smiles and ideas and discoveries and companionship and taco dinners with my boys.  It is a life where even when the first woman who has a real shot at capturing a nomination for President does not get my initial support, because, well, there are a lot of things that need doing.  But now that she has and now that we’re here, I will pause and give the moment the respect it deserves.

I owe that to my ten year old and fourteen year old and twenty-three year old selves.

I’m with her.  And by “her,” I mean my previous selves who knew this day would come, knew it was not some fantastic dream, knew that, of course, a woman is qualified to lead this beautiful, if wounded, country of ours. I am with every suffragette who sacrificed more that I can even imagine.  I am with every young Millennial gal who, perhaps, does not quite realize why today is an historical day.

History was made as I was making dinner.  That’s pretty damn cool. Congratulations, ladies.  Well deserved.