The NRA’s Mom Problem

As a mom who has written about gun legislation and senseless gun violence for almost two years now, I’ve learned a few things about the Internet, human nature, American culture, gun advocates, the NRA, and myself.  I came to write about guns after the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut in December 2012.  That dark day changed me in profound and lasting ways.

Another mother impacted by that day’s events was a gal by the name of Shannon Watts, an Indianapolis mom and former communications executive.  Where I was moved to write about the incidents of December 14, 2012, she was moved to create a grassroots campaign ultimately called Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.

Some might say that Ms. Watts has been successful because she has created a movement that has drawn a tremendous social media presence. Some might say her success can be measured by aligning herself with former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s well oiled gun control campaign, Everytown for Gun Safety. Others might suggest that her success can be seen in national chains like Starbucks and Target rethinking their gun policies after feeling the heat from her organization.

I think her success can best be measured by the NRA clearly being afraid of her.

And, yes, I do believe the NRA is afraid of a mother.  One mother.

How else would you explain the takedown piece they published recently in their propaganda publication, America’s 1st Freedom?  Written by Dave Kopel, the article seems to suggest that Ms. Watts is pulling a fast one on America by painting herself as a stay-at-home mom, when in reality she is nothing more than a shill for Bloomberg.  A highly educated, very experienced shill.  A trained strategist, if you will, in mom jeans.  Pffft.

Ignoring the ridiculously sexist graphics that accompanied the article, Kopel does little to move the NRA’s agenda forward with his article. Instead, he is pandering to the same kind of ill informed, misogynistic, far right base that got the Open Carry Texas movement in such hot water earlier this summer.

When faced with women who dare to speak out against gun violence, women who support education around gun safety, women who coordinate campaigns to educate others about common sense gun laws, these gun advocates — most of them men — use gendered tactics, primarily fear and intimidation, to try and silence us (and yes, I count myself among them, having been visited by more than a few online trolls).  Spitting, rape threats, publishing addresses and phone numbers of gun sense advocates who also happen to be moms, are just some of the cowardly tactics used.

The thing is, though, it’s not working.

In my years of being a Cancer Mom and now childhood cancer advocate, I have frequently used the phrase, “Never underestimate a committed mother.”  Shannon Watts is a committed mother.  She is also an advocate, communications professional, intelligent and composed speaker, and force of nature.  Those things, you see, are not mutually exclusive.

While Mr. Kopel seems to suggest in his article that being a stay-at-home mom only involves the cooking and the cleaning and the wiping of noses and bottoms, he fails to grasp the wealth of abilities so many women who opt out of the work force to focus on families hold.  Hell, our First Lady is a prime example of this.

And so am I.

As a professional with a graduate degree, I was thrust into the role of stay-at-home mom with my daughter’s cancer diagnosis in 2007.  Her treatment was too intense and exhaustive in its scope and required a stay-at-home parent.  Truth be told, I was a bit of an employed mom snob before cancer came a callin’, never thinking I could be fulfilled by full-time child care and home maintenance.  And double truth be told, I am still not completely fulfilled by those things.

That’s why I blog.  That’s why I advocate.  That’s why I fundraise for childhood cancer research.  It’s probably why Shannon Watts does what she does, too.

What the NRA fails to grasp is that mothers are allowed to be multi-dimensional.  We are allowed to be competent care providers and homemakers and still hella talented as gun safety advocates or childhood cancer advocates or as whatever the hell we want to be.  Part of what makes mothers so successful as advocates are because we hold those dear children we are raising so close to us — their well being fuels our fires.

When I write about guns, I brace myself for the comments that will follow. I know that those posts will find readers that don’t reflect my typical reader.  I have learned that the comments will be mean and sexist and threatening and relentless.

I don’t care.  And neither, apparently, does Shannon Watts, which is precisely why the NRA has a mom problem.

Hey-O!  If you don’t want to miss a single post, please subscribe to my bloggy blog.  Here’s how:  

Type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.

How United Airlines Lost My Family’s Business

Author’s Note:  I have never used this blog platform to complain about a consumer experience I have had.  Please know this is not an axe job on United, just a frustrated and worn customer who has had enough. 

It’s never easy to travel these days.  Add two children to the mix and it’s a wee little bit like going to the dentist — it might hurt, but you’ve got to do what you’ve got to do.  At least the dentist gives you Novocain to dull the pain.  United Airlines gives you bupkis.

After a splendiferous, spectacular, amazing family vacation to Northern California, we arrived at San Francisco Airport last Saturday in plenty of time to catch our 4:20 PM flight to Chicago.  Bags were checked, car seat and umbrella stroller carried with us through the terminals.  Our five year old’s flight “distraction pack” was bursting with everything he needed to occupy the almost four hour flight.

We fly fairly regularly with children (2-3 times a year), so know the drill — the secret to easy flights are just packing what you need and keeping it within arm’s reach.  Formula, iPads, books, photo flash cards, snacks, diapers, head phones.  It’s sort of a science and it works for our family.  Knock on wood (or plastic in-flight tables), we’ve never had a serious meltdown on a plane.  Well, I have, but not the kids.

We learned fairly early on that our flight was delayed due to mechanical issues.  No worries.  They would be fixing the plane on site with updates every 30 minutes.  The updates did come every 30 minutes, but grew less encouraging as the time passed.  We heard that the adjacent gate’s flight had been cancelled, also for mechanical reasons, but not to worry, all flyers would be accommodated in a Honolulu hotel until they can catch the next flight to Maui.

Tick tock, tick tock.

It got harder to amuse our five year old at the gate.  There’s only so much to do at an airline gate and as two hours of waiting turned to three, well, yes, it was challenging.  Our little baby, too, who surely would have slept in flight, had way too much to look at and see.  New faces, carpeting, chairs galore.

Having been at the gate four hours at this point, we started to get nervous.  And there was the frequent message from the ticket agent over the loudspeaker, “We have NO NEW INFORMATION.  If you have other questions, you may approach the desk, but if you want to know the status of your flight, we have NO NEW INFORMATION.”

That voice was getting more hostile.

An hour later, at 7:30 PM, they cancelled our 4:20 flight for mechanical reasons.  No other airplane would be found and all passengers were told to approach a customer service desk in another terminal to make other arrangements.  Then the gate agents calmly (and with seeming relief) left the gate.

At this point, you have approximately 100+ passengers trying to make a MAD DASH to the assigned customer service desk.  None of us were welcome at the customer service desk at the end of our terminal.  Nosirree, folks, make your way to the customer service desk in an adjacent terminal.  This is how the line looked when I arrived:

Cattle call at the United Airlines Customer Service Desk
Cattle call at the United Airlines Customer Service Desk

There were four customer service reps.  Three were helping the premier class passengers that had appoximately four people in line.  One sad worker was left to handle the rest of us.  In the 45 minutes I stood in this line, it did not move.  That’s not true, about six passengers just up and left, so yes, it moved, but only by attrition.

Folks get to talking in a situation like this.  It’s a little “us v. them” mentality.  Passengers trade tips.  There was the old man who simply walked to a gate agent and got help without waiting.  There was the bright young man who re-booked using his mobile device and encouraged the rest of us to do the same.  There was the angry mom of teens who was trying to rally a social media campaign against United, #UnitedSucks.

I mainly kept my ears open and texted with my husband who was back at our original gate with the kiddos and luggage.  At this point it was 8:30 PM.  Both kids were well past their bed time.  The line, I’m telling you, had not moved, except it had grown considerably behind me.

I wondered how long it would take to get to the front of that line for our hotel voucher.  Friends outside San Francisco came to our rescue, offering to pick us up immediately and host us for the night.  The gossip going around was that a new flight at 7 AM had been created for two Chicago flights that had been cancelled that afternoon and evening.  Sure enough, we got mobile confirmation of that.  We called an audible and booked it out of there, leaving the airport not certain at all where our baggage might be.  I tried to ask two separate gate agents who both just referred me to the customer service desk I had just abandoned.

There comes a point with kiddos that you learn to just cut your losses.  A family member in the Mission was away for the weekend so we crashed at his place.  It was close and comfortable, but cab fare there and back still ran us over $90.

The next morning we learned just how very lucky we had been.  After returning for our morning flight, we learned from passengers we recognized from the night before that those who had stayed in the customer service line were shuttled to hotels in San Jose, almost a solid hour outside San Fransicso.  They didn’t arrive there until 1 AM and their return shuttle picked them up at 4 AM.

This, United Airlines, is where you really, really lost me.  If a 4:20 PM flight is cancelled at 7:30 PM, how on earth can arrival at a hotel not until 1 o’clock the next morning be justified?  Does it really take FIVE HOURS to work through the customer service cattle call you created?  Yes, apparently, it does.

Now all of this is terribly annoying to passengers, of course, but add a baby to the mix and all bets are off.  Babies need special things like formula and diapers, which we had packed in excess in case of delay, but certainly not for an overnight delay.  Had we been good and obedient little passengers, as we were told, we would have been carted off to San Jose with absolutely no access to drug stores or the formula or diapers our son required, and with only a three hour sleep under us.

No matter how I do the math, it doesn’t add up.

Mechanical things break.  Certainly I want my family to be safe and want those mechanical issues to be addressed and detected on the ground, but while those good folks are doing their jobs, United’s skeletal staff of customer service reps are hemmoraging any good will the passengers might feel towards the airline.

I am a Chicago girl, born and bred.  I have stuck with United Airlines my entire 44 years, wanting to support our local Chicago economy.  No more and not again.

Those 2-3 flights my family takes annually will now be through a different airline.  Those “friendly skies” United touts in its revived marketing campaign touting their return to customer service are not friendly.  Indeed, they are apathetic at best and hostile at worst.  Those friendly skies are overworked and understaffed, leaving employees who don’t give a fig about the customer experience as they look at you blankly with their worn eyes.  They too, you see, have been hanging out at the airport all day.

Huh.  “Fly the apathetic skies,” just doesn’t have a good ring to it.  And “Fly the hostile skies,” well, no thank you.  I will take my family’s business elsewhere.  Know any good airlines with better customer service?  I’m in the market.

Oh!  And did I mention that our 7 AM flight was delayed, too?  Yep!  Mechanical issues!

ADDENDUM:  How did I forget to mention that we had upgraded on this flight just so we could sit together.  Only available seats together when we booked were in Economy+, so we popped for the extra $.  Wouldn’t you know that when we were re-booked automatically, we were put back in economy.  When I brought that to the ticket agent’s attention for the morning flight, he demanded to see proof of having purchased Economy+.  Nothing like taking a customer’s word, especially when your own computer could tell you!

Adoption and Surrogacy and IVF, Oh My!

Seven months into Donna’s cancer treatment, we learned that the docs were recommending a stem cell transplant for her.  The toxicity of the chemo required to kill off her immune system was so potent that the transplant team informed us that Donna, just three years old at the time, would never be able to bear biological children.

We were still firmly in the camp that Donna could survive her brain tumor, and so I grieved a little grief over my two year old’s future fertility.  And then, with our daughter,  headed into one of the most arduous phases of cancer treatment a human can ever experience.  When you are parenting a child with cancer, you learn quickly to do what you need to do and keep moving forward.  It is shocking to learn what choices you are capable of making when your options are so grim.

It was during that period when I first initiated a discussion about adoption with my husband.  “When treatment is over, we should talk about adoption.  If Donna won’t be able to carry children, I want her to know that families are made in all different kinds of ways.”  Our adoption plans eventually became moot, as Donna’s cancer proved so tenacious.

Fast forward a few years, after Donna’s death and the three miscarriages that followed within 18 months.  Adoption was back on the table.

At 42, I wasn’t interested in seeking treatment for infertility.  Despite the miscarriages (4 total, as I had had one earlier), I never thought of myself as infertile, having birthed two full term babies. And my OB/GYN never seemed too curious about what was causing my miscarriages.  Old eggs, we presumed.  Honestly, with my knowledge of what was involved with IVF, I wasn’t interested.  Close friends had been through the process, both successfully and unsuccessfully.  I didn’t think I could take the heartbreak or the medical aspects of it.  A medical trauma like cancer will do that to you.

So in June 2011, just six weeks after my last miscarriage, we initiated the adoption process.  Two years and one adoption agency change later, we would finally connect with the woman who would choose us to raise the son she did not feel capable of raising herself.  We hold this woman very dear to us, as we view adoption as a pact with her, even more sacred than marriage.  She made a brave and selfless choice for her child, one that we honor daily by showering our son with love and care.

I don’t write too much about adoption.  If you poke around the Internet around adoption issues, you will quickly be introduced to the anti-adoption movement.  I don’t know how large or organized or effective the actual movement is, but I do know, from deeply personal experience, that they can be a bullying, angry, and hateful contingent that clearly has “adoption stories” hard wired into their Google alerts.

While I can understand the pain that must precipitate the anti-adoption venom, I cannot condone the tactics or absolutism they employ where adoption is concerned.  It seems almost inconceivable to anti-adoption advocates that healthy, mutually agreed upon adoptions exist.  I have learned I don’t have the stomach for the vitriol that surrounds it.  It is emotionally painful to be judged because of how my family was created and I fully reject the routine accusations of having bought or stolen my baby.

MTM Meme

Historically, that same kind of venom and prejudiced thinking applied to babies conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF) and other reproductive advances.  The science was scary and, well, sciencey.  People questioned if it was God’s will for babies to be made in a test tube. Even now, it is easy to find websites dedicated to condemning the practice and using fear tactics which suggest that babies born through IVF are much more susceptible to birth defects, including an increased risk for cancer.  More reputable sites, i.e., those lacking a religious agenda, state that those concerns are statistically insignificant.

There is also a moral argument made that people who utilize IVF for their family plan simply want “designer babies,” or the ability to choose their child’s gender and even the number of babies per pregnancy.  Twins are so chic this season, don’t you know!  Conversely, the accusations fly that when twin, triplet, quadruplet, or even larger number embryos are the result of a successful IVF, couples are aborting an extra child or children willy nilly.

Surrogacy, too, does not escape the judgment police.  Last week I was engaged in a friend’s Facebook thread about the morality of surrogacy.  An article was posted about a young woman who learned at age 17 that she was born through a surrogate and now works hard to endorse legislative restrictions against the practice of surrogacy.  I left a comment that the young woman could use a therapist (not sarcasm, but a clinical judgment) and that if the worst thing that should befall her is having been born to a surrogate, well, she should count herself lucky.

I had no idea the thread would quickly turn into a condemnation of the practice of surrogacy as being nothing more than “transactional” in nature, no different than a business deal, and lacking the love of conception.  I’ll be honest, this touched a nerve, as I, too, have been accused of exploiting a woman for my own personal gain because of financial privilege.  When I made that argument, that people considered my adoption a transaction, nothing more than a baby bought and paid for, I was quickly reassured that NO!, adoption is a beautiful thing and how could anyone ever think otherwise?  

My argument, that many people did think adoption was a transaction, and were against the practice because of that, was completely lost in the discussion.  In this particular thread, surrogacy was “morally bankrupt,” and adoption was a loving gift, as if the people who had judged my adoption were wrong, but judging surrogacy was grounded in some higher truth.

It turns out, with a wee little bit of a Google search, there is a fairly strong religious (Catholic) and political (conservative) agenda against surrogacy these days.  A growing anti-surrogacy movement, that I personally feel is another means to prevent gay men from parenting, but that’s just me.

I am reminded of my immediate thought after grieving my daughter’s fertility, ” . . . families are made in all different kinds of ways.”  It was so important to me, even in the midst of nursing my girl through her cancer treatment, that she knew and understood that.

It is just as important that those blessedly untouched by infertility or those not in same sex relationships understand the concept as well.  Not all of us are able to procreate easily and without intervention.  Less judging, more loving.  Families are made in all different kinds of ways, and if those ways are ethical and loving and sincere of intentions, then stop the judging.

If it’s simple enough for a two year old to understand, surely us adults can get there, too, right?

Hey-O!  If you don’t want to miss a single post, please subscribe to my bloggy blog.  Here’s how:  

Type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.